Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy

Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy

  • Downloads:7546
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2022-01-10 03:19:05
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:David J. Chalmers
  • ISBN:B098TY2C1C
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Virtual reality is genuine reality。 That’s the central thesis of Reality+。 In a highly original work of “technophilosophy,” David J。 Chalmers argues that virtual worlds generated by computers are not second-class worlds。 We can live a meaningful life in virtual reality。 We may even be living in a computer simulation already—and if we are, that’s not so bad。


What is reality, anyway? How do we know there’s an external world? What’s the relation between mind and body? How can we lead a good life? Is there a god? In Reality+, Chalmers conducts a grand tour of philosophy, using virtual worlds to illuminate all of these questions and to provide new answers to many of them。


Studded with illustrations that bring philosophical issues to life, Reality+ is a major statement that will shape discussion of philosophy and technology for years to come。

Download

Reviews

Kristine

Reality+ by David J。 Chalmers is a free NetGalley ebook that I read in late December。Just a day or so after watching Matrix Resurrections, I began to read this book, which goes way deeply into what characters from the movie might've mentioned in passing or experienced as just another aspect of the Matrix, like seamless, tangible virtual interactions and realities different than our own, questions that need to be addressed when thinking about if one person's view of the world is real or an illusi Reality+ by David J。 Chalmers is a free NetGalley ebook that I read in late December。Just a day or so after watching Matrix Resurrections, I began to read this book, which goes way deeply into what characters from the movie might've mentioned in passing or experienced as just another aspect of the Matrix, like seamless, tangible virtual interactions and realities different than our own, questions that need to be addressed when thinking about if one person's view of the world is real or an illusion, and keeping parts of yourself for yourself without divulging everything and the full extent of your persona online。 。。。more

CB_Read

I wasn't able to completely finish this ARC before it was archived, but I'm so glad to have read the first half of this book。This book is as much an updated primer on the traditional problems of philosophy as it is a collection of original arguments from Chalmers。 The author writes clearly and persuasively without diminishing other points of view, and he keeps the denser sections of philosophical arguments toward the end of each section, allowing pretty much anyone to pick up this book and gain I wasn't able to completely finish this ARC before it was archived, but I'm so glad to have read the first half of this book。This book is as much an updated primer on the traditional problems of philosophy as it is a collection of original arguments from Chalmers。 The author writes clearly and persuasively without diminishing other points of view, and he keeps the denser sections of philosophical arguments toward the end of each section, allowing pretty much anyone to pick up this book and gain something from it。What makes the traditional problems (of knowledge, of reality, and of value) in need of updating is the invention of virtual reality, writes Chalmers。 Even though ancient philosophers have puzzled at these questions since well before our time, the author argues that VR is special because it allows us to come closer to solving these ancient problems。 Potentially the most controversial premise of Chalmers's book is his core thesis: Virtual worlds (VR) are real worlds; they are genuinely inhabited by real objects (that are digital) and by real people ("pure sims" as he calls them); and, based on arguments from the Simulation hypothesis, it is impossible to prove that we are not living in a virtual world of our own。Nearly the entire first half of the book is dedicated to this question and Chalmers evaluating the arguments for and against it。 Certain chapters get into the weeds, while others maintain an overview of the subject。 I wish I hadn't spent as much time reading every word of this section and instead pushed through to the middle and beyond, because that's where the really interesting stuff is。 Chalmers must first establish the Simulation hypothesis before moving on, so I understand why it is presented the way that it is。An exciting new book from one of contemporary philosophy's most "out-there" philosophers。 。。。more